Why is everyone here obsessed with NTR?

[tanstaafl]

I want to think that I am more than an ordinary person

If this is in response to my normal humans and empathy statement, I think you're backwards if you are implying you wouldn't. That would technically make you less than an ordinary human.

 

[Jaike]

You "think" you got into an argument with a mod and they hate-tagged your game AI.

"there's almost no accountability when it happens"

First - your game's artwork looks AI. even if you say it's not. It looks it. Maybe if it didn't look it, there wouldn't have been an issue. You requested it changed and it got removed. Amazing that.

No, they can't tag/untag your game as they like. If you find that happening, then file a support ticket.

Second - yes, there is accountability.
View attachment 4555033

As for asking people to support you - I'm sure you did so in a way which broke a rule. If not, you should have filed a support ticket.

If there are posts which break rules regarding netorare in your game thread, report the posts. If it isn't resolved they way you think it should be, file a support ticket.

Says there is no accountability, but when they find their game with a tag they say is incorrect and submit a request to get the tag removed, it gets removed. Doesn't realize the irony.

I mean, skyblueaster, it's unlikely there's really hate-tagging going on because it's likely because some user reported it for AI art. But it's kind of a bad process that it was added, even if you can see why that'd happen. Especially because it isn't unreasonable to expect that some users ignored the topic for the mistaken AI art tag. Though these numbers may be pretty low. Tbh there's a bit of a trade off too, there are advantages to quickly accepting tag reports too.

But you know the kind of accountability they meant, and while I think that's a bad idea it isn't hard to see where they comes from.

 

[Count Morado]

But you know the kind of accountability they meant, and while I think that's a bad idea it isn't hard to see where they comes from.

I can see where they are coming from, I disagree with what they want.

Because, what they want is for their conspiracy theory to be true and for the evil, bad, meanie moderator who did such a terrible thing to them as tagging their game with AI CG to be named and they want to personally know that the moderator's knuckles have been properly wrapped with the ruler. Can you imagine how much hurt thatoderator caused them?!?!?!?? I mean, look how my observation that their game's art looks AI to me caused them such pain. Now imagine how the tag must have been a near mortal blow. They are lucky to have survived the onslaught

 

[Jaike]

I disagree with what they want.

I agree with that.

Because, what they want is for their conspiracy theory to be true and for the evil, bad, meanie moderator who did such a terrible thing to them as tagging their game with AI CG to be named and they want to personally know that the moderator's knuckles have been properly wrapped with the ruler.

Yes, sounds like that's the "accountability" that's sought, unwisely.

Can you imagine how much hurt thatoderator caused them?!?!?!?? I mean, look how my observation that their game's art looks AI to me caused them such pain. Now imagine how the tag must have been a near mortal blow. They are lucky to have survived the onslaught

I think this sarcasm is too harsh though. If someone actually paid an artist to draw the artwork, it's natural that comparisons to AI art aren't gonna be liked. And incorrect tags still mislead.

 

[Count Morado]

I think this sarcasm is too harsh though. If someone actually paid an artist to draw the artwork, it's natural that comparisons to AI art aren't gonna be liked. And incorrect tags still mislead.

There's a difference between "aren't going to be liked" and taking it personally to the point that the developer whines not to "disparage my game and my artist like that? It may look AI to you, but if you have nothing nice to say, then please stop with the snide comments, because it’s very hurtful especially to my artist."

The first is understandable, the second is immature. We are not in primary school. If you are going to put content out, you should be ready for both compliments and criticism. Hell, my simply saying the art looks like AI is about the softest-worded criticism one could get on this site. I didn't say I don't like AI (as we know, I'm in the middle ground on AI usage) and therefore their game's art is shit because it looks like AI.

It is an observation, one many have made about their game's art, obviously. I didn't even go look at the art until after someone brought it up that the game had an AI CG tag and that the art looked AI. If they have a problem with the comparison, then either they need to consider some artistic revisions or accept that there are a number of people who will make the comparison and move on.

I went that far with the sarcasm because they went that far in their accusations about the moderation and their response to me.

I get what you are saying... But I disagree that it was uncalled for.