I too, especially knowing that underwear only actually appeared as it around the 15th centuryI prefer "historically accurate" underwear over modern underwear in actually historical settings, [...]
Something's missing here "as it around".I too, especially knowing that underwear only actually appeared as it around the 15th century![]()
You'll find no guy calling them underwear. We are basic you know, camisoles are shirts, smocks or chemises are nighties, those aren't underwear in our limited mind. Especially when it come to games you can find here. If there isn't lace, it's not undies. And if there's lace, but it cover more than the bare minimal, it's no undies either, but an appetizerAnyway, women still wore other underwear like smocks or chemises, [...]
You'd think simple creatures could appreciate the easy access they'd have with smocks without underpants, especially on a site like this.You'll find no guy calling them underwear. We are basic you know, camisoles are shirts, smocks or chemises are nighties, those aren't underwear in our limited mind. Especially when it come to games you can find here. If there isn't lace, it's not undies. And if there's lace, but it cover more than the bare minimal, it's no undies either, but an appetizer![]()
Oh, but we appreciate it, like we appreciate when the girl goes commando under her dress or skirt.You'd think simple creatures could appreciate the easy access they'd have with smocks without underpants, especially on a site like this.![]()
![]()